logo

When Financial Aid Is Not Enough: The Smart Indonesia Program, Social Capital, and Learning Quality at MAN 1 Pidie

Fitriadi Fitriadi
Magister Sosiologi, Universitas Malikussaleh, Lhokseumawe, Indonesia

Saifuddin Saifuddin
Magister Sosiologi, Universitas Malikussaleh, Lhokseumawe, Indonesia

Fauzi Fauzi
Magister Sosiologi, Universitas Malikussaleh, Lhokseumawe, Indonesia

Mursyidin Mursyidin
Magister Sosiologi, Universitas Malikussaleh, Lhokseumawe, Indonesia

Alwi Alwi
Magister Sosiologi, Universitas Malikussaleh, Lhokseumawe, Indonesia

Abstract

The Smart Indonesia Program (Program Indonesia Pintar, PIP) is designed to reduce educational costs for students from poor and vulnerable households. Its role in widening access is widely recognised, yet its contribution to learning quality remains less direct. This article examines how PIP shaped educational access and learning quality at Madrasah Aliyah Negeri 1 Pidie, Aceh, Indonesia, with particular attention to the role of social capital. Using a qualitative case study design, data were collected through observation, semi-structured interviews with beneficiary students, parents, teachers, and the madrasah principal, and documentation related to programme implementation. The analysis draws on Bourdieu’s concept of social capital to explain why financial assistance does not always produce equal educational outcomes. PIP reduced routine schooling costs, including uniforms, books, stationery, and transportation, and helped students from low-income families remain enrolled. It also increased confidence and supported school participation among several beneficiaries. However, its influence on learning quality was less consistent. Some students continued to show weak motivation, low discipline, and limited academic improvement, while the funds were often used for basic schooling needs rather than academic enrichment such as tutoring, additional learning materials, skills training, or digital learning resources. The programme’s educational value depended on parental guidance, teacher mentoring, communication between school and family, school monitoring, and the efficiency of fund disbursement. The article argues that PIP provides economic capital, but its conversion into stronger learning quality requires social capital, cultural resources, and institutional support. Financial aid can keep students in school, but learning quality depends on a broader support system that connects economic assistance with social guidance and academic development.

Keywords:

Smart Indonesia Program, Financial Aid, Social Capital, Learning Quality, Educational Access, Madrasah

References

Al-Samarrai, S., & Cerdan-Infantes, P. (2013). Where did all the money go? Financing basic education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 33(3), 284–295. doi:10.1016/j.ijedudev.2012.04.002

Alatas, V., Banerjee, A., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., & Tobias, J. (2012). Targeting the poor: Evidence from a field experiment in Indonesia. American Economic Review, 102(4), 1206–1240. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.102.4.1206

Bourdieu, P. (1986). The forms of capital. In J. G. Richardson (Ed.), Handbook of theory and research for the sociology of education (pp. 241–258). Greenwood Press.

Cahyadi, N., Hanna, R., Olken, B. A., Prima, R. A., Satriawan, E., & Syamsulhakim, E. (2020). Cumulative impacts of conditional cash transfer programs: Experimental evidence from Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Economic Policy, 12(4), 88–110. https://doi.org/10.1257/pol.20190245

Creswell, J. W. (2013). Qualitative inquiry and research design: Choosing among five approaches (3rd ed.). SAGE Publications.

de Ree, J., Muralidharan, K., Pradhan, M., & Rogers, F. H. (2018). Double for nothing? Experimental evidence on an unconditional teacher salary increase in Indonesia. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 133(2), 993–1039. https://doi.org/10.1093/qje/qjx040

Dimmera, B. G., & Purnasari, P. D. (2020). Permasalahan dan solusi Program Indonesia Pintar dalam mewujudkan pemerataan pendidikan di Kabupaten Bengkayang. Sebatik, 24(2), 307–314. https://doi.org/10.46984/sebatik.v24i2.1137

Duflo, E. (2001). Schooling and labor market consequences of school construction in Indonesia: Evidence from an unusual policy experiment. American Economic Review, 91(4), 795–813. https://doi.org/10.1257/aer.91.4.795

Fiqih, M., Dayat, U., & Febriantin, K. (2021). Implementasi kebijakan Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) pada jenjang sekolah dasar. Kinerja: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Manajemen, 18(4), 539–546. https://doi.org/10.30872/jkin.v18i4.10097

Hamdi, S., Setiawan, R., & Musyadad, F. (2020). Evaluation of the implementation of Indonesia Pintar program in vocational school. Jurnal Penelitian dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 24(1), 102–115. https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v24i1.32603

Kristiansen, S., & Pratikno. (2006). Decentralising education in Indonesia. International Journal of Educational Development, 26(5), 513–531. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijedudev.2005.12.003

Miles, M. B., & Huberman, A. M. (1994). Qualitative data analysis: An expanded sourcebook (2nd ed.). SAGE Publications.

Neuman, W. L. (2014). Social research methods: Qualitative and quantitative approaches (7th ed.). Pearson.

Newhouse, D., & Beegle, K. (2006). The effect of school type on academic achievement: Evidence from Indonesia (May 2005). https://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.753544

Pradhan, M., Suryadarma, D., Beatty, A., Wong, M., Alishjabana, A., Gaduh, A., & Artha, R. P. (2014). Improving educational quality through enhancing community participation: Results from a randomized field experiment in Indonesia. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 6(2), 105–126. https://doi.org/10.1257/app.6.2.105

Rakista, P. M. (2020). Implementasi Kebijakan Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP): Studi kasus pada sekolah dasar di Kabupaten Banyumas. Sawala: Jurnal Administrasi Negara, 8(2), 224–232. https://doi.org/10.30656/sawala.v8i2.2774

Septiawati, S. E., Prasetijowati, T., & Nurany, F. (2022). Analisis penerapan Program Indonesia Pintar (PIP) perspektif good governance di lingkungan madrasah. Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik (JISIP), 11(3), 267–274. https://doi.org/10.33366/jisip.v11i3.2556

Sparrow, R. (2007). Protecting education for the poor in times of crisis: An evaluation of a scholarship programme in Indonesia. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics, 69(1), 99–122. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-0084.2006.00438.x

Sugiyono. (2019). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif, dan R&D. Alfabeta.

Suryadarma, D., Suryahadi, A., Sumarto, S., & Rogers, F. H. (2006). Improving student performance in public primary schools in developing countries: Evidence from Indonesia. Education Economics, 14(4), 401–429. https://doi.org/10.1080/09645290600854110

Yusup, W. B., Ismanto, B., & Wasitohadi. (2019). Evaluasi Program Indonesia Pintar dalam peningkatan akses pendidikan di sekolah menengah pertama. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 6(1), 44–53. https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2019.v6.i1.p44-53

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

How to Cite

When Financial Aid Is Not Enough: The Smart Indonesia Program, Social Capital, and Learning Quality at MAN 1 Pidie. (2026). Sinthop: Media Kajian Pendidikan, Agama, Sosial Dan Budaya, 5(1), 194-206. https://doi.org/10.69548/sinthop.v5.i1.122.194-206

Similar Articles

1-10 of 65

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.